|
be + -ing >
valeurs validation + décision irrévocable
/ futur
programmé (agenda)

The Guardian p. 27
8.9.2006

Don Wright
The Palm
Beach Post, FL Cagle
24.8.2005
http://cagle.msnbc.com/politicalcartoons/PCcartoons/donwright.asp
Background:
U.S. dismisses call for Chavez's killing
Venezuela VP urges U.S. to act on Robertson's 'criminal' remark
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Bush administration officials Tuesday
dismissed
Christian broadcaster Pat Robertson's call for the assassination of Venezuelan
President Hugo Chavez
as the remarks of a private citizen, but Venezuela accused Robertson of
promoting terrorism.
CNN Wednesday, August 24, 2005;
Posted: 1:34 a.m. EDT (05:34 GMT)
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/08/23/robertson.chavez/

Gary Markstein
Copley News Service
Cagle
9 October 2009

Loomus Steven
Appleby The Guardian
Family p. 2
11.2.2006

The Guardian p. 7
20.12.2005

The Guardian p. 19
10.12.2004
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1370507,00.html

Judge Parker
Harold LeDoux and Woody Wilson
Created in 1952 by Nicholas P. Dallis
7.1.2005
http://www.kingfeatures.com/features/comics/jparker/about.htm

Judge Parker
Harold LeDoux and Woody Wilson
created in 1952 by Nicholas P. Dallis
29.8.2004
http://www.kingfeatures.com/features/comics/jparker/about.htm

Judge Parker
Harold LeDoux and Woody Wilson
Created in 1952 by Nicholas P. Dallis
1.12.2004
http://www.kingfeatures.com/features/comics/jparker/about.htm

Mark Trail Jack
Elrod
Created by Ed Dodd in 1946
19.11.2004
http://www.kingfeatures.com/features/comics/mtrail/about.htm

Chip Bok
Akron Beacon
Journal / Cagle
7.9.2004
http://cagle.slate.msn.com/politicalcartoons/PCcartoons/bok.asp
L: John Kerry.
R: George W. Bush.

Sandy Huffaker
Cagle
30.8.2004
http://cagle.slate.msn.com/politicalcartoons/PCcartoons/huffaker.asp

John Deering
Band of brothers
Cagle
30.8.2004
http://cagle.slate.msn.com/politicalcartoons/PCcartoons/deering.asp

The
Guardian p. 34
Wednesday 18.5.2005
http://digital.guardian.co.uk/guardian/2005/05/18/pages/brd34.shtml
Letters
Is ‘Marriage’ Subject to Compromise?
February 25, 2009
The New York Times
To the Editor:
Re “A Reconciliation on Gay Marriage,” by David Blankenhorn and Jonathan Rauch
(Op-Ed, Feb. 22):
My partner and I are
getting married
this summer (in Massachusetts, of course). One of my dearest friends is
an evangelical Christian and does not support same-sex marriage. Knowing her
feelings, I told her that I would not be hurt if she didn’t come to the wedding.
To my surprise, she said she planned to attend. When I asked why, she responded,
“I want you to be happy.”
My relationship with my friend has convinced me that it is possible to arrive at
a compromise on the issue of same-sex marriage. I’m concerned, though, that the
compromise David Blankenhorn and Jonathan Rauch suggest would create another
“separate but not equal” situation.
The way to prevent marriages and civil unions from becoming a two-tiered unequal
system is for the federal government to establish a category called “civil
union” available to both heterosexual and homosexual couples. I believe that
given the choice, many heterosexual couples who are not religious would choose
civil unions. And heterosexuals like my friend who are religious and want to be
recognized by their religious organization would continue to choose marriage.
Denise Danford
Media, Pa., Feb. 22, 2009
Is ‘Marriage’ Subject
to Compromise?, NYT, 25.2.2009,
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/25/opinion/l25marriage.html
Next time I see you I'm
arresting you.
Réplique du personnage joué par Catherine Zeta-Jones dans Ocean's Twelve (2004).
Zeta-Jones, qui joue le rôle d'un limier d'Europol, tombe par hasard sur son
ancien amant,
spécialiste des cambriolages. Elle le laisse filer sans l'arrêter.
Traduction explicative :
la prochaine fois, je t'arrête, tu
m'as bien compris ?
One last time and we're
going.
Un père à son fils qui ne veut pas quitter une aire de jeux.
Traductions explicatives :
Bon, encore une fois, mais après on y
va, hein.
D'accord encore une fois mais après il faut vraiment qu'on y aille.
Voir aussi
modaux > will > will
+ be + -ing > valeurs
|