|
|
|
groupe nominal > GN simple adjectifs nominalisés / substantivés the + adjectif nominalisé + verbe au pluriel the jobless are lazy
The Guardian p. 1 3.11.2004
The rich want a better world? Try paying fair wages and tax
A generous billionaire is preferable to a mean one. But Bill Gates et al could make pledges that mean more than just charity
The rich want a
better world? Try paying fair wages and tax, G, 5.8.2010,
Why We Love to Think the Jobless Are Lazy Mythology, narcissism, and 'raw fear' drive conceit
By Matt Cantor, Newser Staff
(Newser) – In America, we like to think that the unemployed are to blame for their joblessness —that, in the words of Ben Stein, they’re “people with poor work habits and poor personalities." But any economist will tell you that’s not true, writes David Sirota in Salon. The real problem: there are “five applicants for every one job opening.” So why do we keep believing the jobless are lazy— that, in essence, "15 million jobless Americans are George Costanzas"?
Why We Love to Think
the Jobless Are Lazy, R, 19.12.2010,
The loyal, the let-down, the critical and the regretful
Labour MPs apply their benchmark to the Butler findings and the prime minister's position
Headline and sub, G, 15.7.2004,
LABOR: How Many Jobless?
Monday, Mar. 17, 1930
How many workmen were jobless throughout the land last week not even the President of the U.S. knew. Government officials made guesses on unemployment, colored more by partisan politics than by positive facts. Senators flayed the Department of Labor for its paltry system of gathering labor statistics. The City of Milwaukee opened soup kitchens. Bread lines stretched out in Brooklyn. Manhattan's Bowery swarmed with sullen idle men. Communists staged demonstrations throughout the U.S. as well as abroad (see p. 21). Though these things combined to make the Hoover Administration acutely unemployment-conscious, none of them answered the question: how many jobless?
LABOR: How Many
Jobless?, T, 17.3.1930,
|
|
www.anglonautes.com
|
